Random thoughts about publishing

icon Site Feed

Labels

Acrobat DITA Open Toolkit DITA XMetaL FrameMaker DITA__TechComm DOS DRM Flash FrameMaker InDesign Microsoft Word PDF Photoshop RSS feeds STC SWF SnagIt TechComm Suite Twitter XSL DITA OT customizing specialization XSL DITA OT customizing specialization.php XSLT accessibility adobe analysis apostrophes blogs book business cake change management cmd comments concerts conferences cowbell cranky dita ditalini recipes potluck dita ditalini doctrain doctraineast07 doctraineast08 doctrainwest08 documentation drag and drop ePublisher Pro entertainment equations fish flare framemaker review free garlic georgina's gilbane08 globalization graphics WMF green hacking history humor is08 jobs localization madcap music outlook oxygen path names podcasts potluck predictions presentations print on demand publishing punctuation quark ratings recipes regular expressions reviews robohelp screen captures secured PDF specialization stc09 stc2008 structured authoring survey techcomm alliance technical writing tekom thirst for knowledge thunderbird toc2007 trademark training travel unspoken rule user group video games volunteering vote citizenship rights weather web 2.0 webcasts white papers wiki writersua2008 xmetal xml strategist xml xpubs xsl-fo xsl

Palimpsest

 

Conflict over PDF creation in Microsoft Office

Friday, June 02, 2006 — posted by Sarah

[Updated to clarify OpenOffice reference and add link to Gilbane discussion]

This is a very odd story. I read the entire Wall Street Journal article that's referenced, and I still don't understand.

Here's the core of the matter:

Adobe wants Microsoft to remove the [PDF creation] feature and offer it separately for a fee. Microsoft has agreed to remove the feature but is unwilling to charge for it, [Microsoft general counsel Brad] Smith said.

"Adobe has threatened antitrust action unless Microsoft agrees to raise its prices, in particular for the software that would allow Microsoft Office users to save a document in the Adobe PDF format," he said.

An Adobe spokeswoman said that Adobe wouldn't comment on specific talks with Microsoft, but in general said that Adobe Chief Executive Bruce Chizen has publicly expressed concern about the possibility that Microsoft might abuse its monopoly in personal-computer software.

"We've discussed our concerns openly, both with Microsoft as well as with a number of regulatory agencies around the world," said Holly Campbell, the spokeswoman. She declined to comment on whether Adobe plans to file an antitrust suit against Microsoft.

The Guardian has more details: Adobe makes Microsoft remove PDF support from Guardian Unlimited: Technology

Let's look at what's going on, though. Microsoft's general counsel is giving interviews to the Wall Street Journal expressing "concern" about the situation. Microsoft is claiming that Adobe is threatening to sue. Adobe doesn't exactly deny it. I love the reference to discussions with regulatory agencies. When was the last time you had a voluntary conversation with, say, your local tax authority?

This is much bigger than the story indicates. The reference to OpenOffice [in the Guardian article] is a total red herring. I'm pretty sure OpenOffice does not use Adobe software to create PDF.

Update: Frank Gilbane has a brief post on the matter.
10:51 AM Permalink | |

<< Home

divider


Scriptorium Publishing | Post Office Box 12761 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 | (919) 481 2701 | info@scriptorium.com