Random thoughts about publishing

icon Site Feed

Labels

Acrobat DITA Open Toolkit DITA XMetaL FrameMaker DITA__TechComm DOS DRM Flash FrameMaker InDesign Microsoft Word PDF Photoshop RSS feeds STC SWF SnagIt TechComm Suite Twitter XSL DITA OT customizing specialization XSL DITA OT customizing specialization.php XSLT accessibility adobe analysis apostrophes blogs book business cake change management cmd comments concerts conferences cowbell cranky dita ditalini recipes potluck dita ditalini doctrain doctraineast07 doctraineast08 doctrainwest08 documentation drag and drop ePublisher Pro entertainment equations fish flare framemaker review free garlic georgina's gilbane08 globalization graphics WMF green hacking history humor is08 jobs localization madcap music outlook oxygen path names podcasts potluck predictions presentations print on demand publishing punctuation quark ratings recipes regular expressions reviews robohelp screen captures secured PDF specialization stc09 stc2008 structured authoring survey techcomm alliance technical writing tekom thirst for knowledge thunderbird toc2007 trademark training travel unspoken rule user group video games volunteering vote citizenship rights weather web 2.0 webcasts white papers wiki writersua2008 xmetal xml strategist xml xpubs xsl-fo xsl

Palimpsest

 

Update: ePublisher Pro license

Thursday, May 24, 2007 — posted by Sarah

This evening, Quadralay's Vice President of Sales posted some additional details about the licensing program in the wwp-users group (message available here, but only if you are a member of the group). He also pointed to a PDF version of the EULA, available here.

This agreement, dated May 24, 2007, removes the most onerous provisions that I described in an earlier post. In particular:
Notably, they are no longer claiming that reviewers are "users."

By the standards of the previous license, this seems almost reasonable.

Almost.

The content development process is increasingly complex. Two scenarios that don't fit the new model very well are:
According to Greg Roig:
An important note to include here is that these users are defined as
those that create and compile source documents. Those people in the
organization who only contribute content to source documents are not
considered users. So if you are an SME [subject matter expert] or you write code or text that gets placed into a source document, you are not required to be licensed.
In the case of a FrameMaker-based workflow, the SMEs rarely have access to the FrameMaker source files directly. But in a Word or DITA-based workflow, SMEs often "modify source documents."

Finally, there is no pricing available on Quadralay's web site. To get a quote, you must fill out a form and contact Quadralay.

I still think the correct answer is to take a hard look at a standards-based workflow with XML and XSL.

Labels:


8:00 PM Permalink | |

<< Home

divider


Scriptorium Publishing | Post Office Box 12761 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 | (919) 481 2701 | info@scriptorium.com