Random thoughts about publishing

icon Site Feed

Labels

Palimpsest has moved. Please visit our blog in its new location for the most recent posts from Scriptorium.

Palimpsest

 

TOC: Social Software/Gavin Bell

Tuesday, June 19, 2007 — posted by Sarah

Uh oh. Trouble with getting the presentation to display. I hate it when that happens.

OTOH, I usually get into my presentation room a LOT early.

Gavin Bell with Nature Publishing Group out of the U.K. Works on social software and web publishing for his employer.

Hmmm. Refuses to start without his slides. I feel his pain, sort of.

Nature Publishing Group publishes numerous journal (35) and also other long-form stuff. So, how to make social software interact with consumers.

Web provides a platform where individuals can talk to each other.

Moves and fiction books are typical accessed sequentially. Web content and music are typically accessed randomly.

Books, moves, and magazines are primarily analog. Others are primarily digital.

The key difference between them is the presence or absence of a plot, which traditionally requires sequential access. The presence of plot can result in reviews that disclose the plot and thus ruin the book experience ("spoilers"). Spoilers are not an issue for music.

This could be interesting, but we're still having technical issues. Hey, a presentation!

History of social software available here.

Social media refers to things like YouTube and Flickr.

Another reference to the fact that books have no batteries. And interestingly, books require your complete attention. Unlike web surfing, you don't give a book only partial attention. (Actually, that's not true. Am I the only person out there who reads while cooking??)

The relationship with digital media can be particularly deep. iPod is not just a music player, but also a data capture device. It learns about listening and viewing patterns. This helps you form a long-term relationship with your iPod and crucially with the underlying iTunes software.

One interesting point: All of the social software found online has analog/offline equivalents. Nobody has invented anything new online, and it's important to carry over behavior expectations into the online world. (I'm not sure I agree with this, but I can't think of a counter-example off the top of my head. Somehow, I have that old quote in my head..."On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.")

Examples of effective sites: flickr.com
Flickr only works when you sure life experiences with your friends. Need your friends to be at Flickr with you. Without friends, the experience is basically pointless. Flickr started out in a totally different space and evolved into their current space.

twitter
Lets you tell your friends what you're doing.
There's no content behind/inside Twitter. (Not very sticky.) No strong ties. (I have to say I think Twitter is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen.)

typepad
Blogging platform.

myspace
Works because of the music. Teens joined myspace because of the music community already present.

facebook
Started in educational market. Place for core friendship network. They have an API, so you can write additional applications.

Online commenting at The Guardian was troublesome because columnist were responding only in print (and not on the commenting sight).

Publishing examples:
Eyewitness Travel Guides
others

Moral: Focus on specific microcontent and niches.

Message boards tend to become isolated from other content. Better to build interactivity directly into the site rather than segregating forums away somewhere else.

Finally, his own site, the Nature Network. Advice: Allow participants to invite others. Use tagging, such as del.icio.us or technorati.

If an author is already blogging on his own, what could a publisher offer to make it appealing to move to the publisher's site?

Publisher can offer reading groups and book recommendations.

Can build communities around specialist subjects, especially use "pro-am" talent -- amateurs who are producing at a professional level.

URLs need to be short, memorable, and readable. Not acceptable to have system-generated URLs, which are usually long, nasty, and full of special characters.

Summary:
An uneven presentation with some interesting information. Could have used a lot more depth and fewer examples. And a presentation working from the first minute. The summary at the end was quite excellent.

Labels:


5:56 PM Permalink | |

<< Home

divider


Scriptorium Publishing | Post Office Box 12761 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 | (919) 481 2701 | info@scriptorium.com